Community Cup 2013

Last week Wizards of the Coast announced the initial details for the Community Cup 2013 event. For those unfamiliar with this event, each year Wizards brings together a team of players from the Magic Online community and flies them to Seattle to compete in a series of events against a hand-picked team of WotC employees. But it's much more than that. Each year the community team gets to enjoy a tour of WotC headquarters, special interviews with key employees, and all sorts of unique and zany experiences. Then, at the end of the weekend, whichever team has assembled the most points takes home the Community Cup for the year.

While the player community has dominated most the events, last year our string of successes came crashing to an end as Wizards of the Coast won the trophy for the first time. From my perspective, last year was the first time that WotC got serious about winning this event, and I would not surprised to see another strong showing this year.

To that end, it's vitally important that the right people get chosen to participate. Each year, Wizards of the Coast takes nominations from the community as to who should represent us at this annual event. You can use this form to send them your choice for this year's team. You will have to have an active account on the Wizards site to utilize that form. Also, when nominating potential candidates, these are the desired qualifications:

• How has this player contributed to Magic Online and its community? Creating and sustaining casual formats, helping new players learn the game, answering questions in the forums—all of these are actions worthy for nomination.
  
• How well will this player represent the community at the event? Is he or she a good sport? Does he or she handle winning and losing gracefully? Is this someone you'd personally enjoy playing against?
  
• What has this person done to help raise awareness for Magic Online? Articles, live streams, recorded videos, and social media conversations about Magic Online are all great ways to expand public awareness about the game and its players and will make your player a strong nomination for the Community Cup.

For those of you who use Twitter, you can keep up with all Community Cup related Tweets at hashtag #mtgocc.

Speaking of Twitter, here are a few tweets from people I respect nominating other players:

The Pauper community from PDCMagic.com has traditionally sent at least one member to this great event as well, and some initial discussion of candidates can be found here.

I don't know about you, but I can't wait to see what this year's Community Cup has in store. Let's field the strongest team we can, and take back the trophy from Wizards this year! Thanks for reading.

Life Update and More Izzet Blitz

For those of you wondering whether or not I have fallen off the face of the earth, I have in fact finally relocated to Indiana to start my new position. Unfortunately, we are living out of boxes in a house almost two hours from my new job while we wait for our old house to close and for the chance to move into our new one. While I do have Internet access, my free time is very limited, and it's made it increasingly difficult to do anything other than what is absolutely necessary. Fortunately, this is a short term situation, and things should be getting better soon. I might even play MPDC this Monday, assuming my work laptop gets out of customs...

But enough about that. As I promised last time, here is a full decklist for Izzet Blitz, a Standard Pauper deck based upon one assembled by Travis Woo of Channel Fireball fame.

Izzet Blitz

A Standard Pauper deck by gwyned

Creatures 4 Delver of Secrets 3 Frostburn Weird 3 Goblin Electromancer 4 Nivix Cyclops 14 cards Other Spells 4 Artful Dodge 4 Faithless Looting 4 Negate 4 Pillar of Flame 4 Think Twice 4 Searing Spear 2 Dispel 26 cards

Lands 6 Island 2 Evolving Wilds 4 Haunted Fengraf 4 Izzet Guildgate 4 Mountain 20 cards Sideboard 4 Essence Scatter 3 Curse of the Pierced Heart 3 Electrickery 3 Mizzium Skin 2 Thunderbolt 15 cards

Here's how I tweaked the deck since last time:

1. I went ahead and increased the total number of creatures from 12 to 14. I really wanted access to both Frostburn Weird and Goblin Electromancer (which I neglected last post entirely!), but decided to only include 3 copies of each to maximize the space for spells.
2. I cut Thought Scour entirely from the list, essentially replacing it with four copies of Think Twice. Without a Snapcaster Mage, the deck has very little way of gaining advantage off getting cards into the Graveyard. Think Twice should prove to be vastly superior, especially with Flashback.
3. I ended up including 6 permission spells (which still might be too few) in order to protect the relatively small number of creatures. Removal is far more dominant in Standard Pauper than in Standard, and having the means to sidestep removal is going to be key to this deck's success.
4. I decided to try out the full playset of Haunted Fengraf. Returning creatures from the Graveyard will be pretty important, and should outweigh the disadvantages of having four colorless sources in a deck with only 20 lands.
5. For the Sideboard, I wanted to give the deck the ability to shift into a more controlling build as well as the ability to better protect its own creatures. Thunderbolt helps against the myriad of Flyers in the metagame, while Electrickery can be quite potent against other more aggressive strategies.

So that's the list. And unless something dramatic happens, this is the list I will be running this coming Monday for MPDC. Hope to see many of you there. Thanks for reading!

Izzet Blitz

Even though I currently don't play much in the way of Standard or Limited, I am a huge fan of Channel Fireball and regularly keep up with their articles and videos. Today on their site, Travis Woo posted a brand new deck entitled Izzet Blitz. Normally, this wouldn't be something I would pay much attention to, since even though it is built around Nivix Cyclops (a Common from Dragon's Maze), it is clearly a Standard deck.  However, a quick look at the actual decklist revealed something quite surprising. It turns out that the majority of the deck is made up of Commons - 24 out of a total of 40 cards, not including Lands. This is surprisingly high percentage. Let's take a quick look at Travis' decklist:

Izzet Blitz

A Standard deck by Travis Woo

Creatures 4 Snapcaster Mage 4 Guttersnipe 4 Nivix Cyclops 12 cards Other Spells 4 Artful Dodge 4 Faithless Looting 4 Pillar of Flame 4 Thought Scour 4 Boros Charm 4 Izzet Charm 4 Searing Spear 28 cards

Lands 3 Glacial Fortress 2 Hallowed Fountain 4 Steam Vents 4 Sulfur Falls 2 Clifftop Retreat 4 Sacred Foundry 1 Mountain 20 cards Sideboard 2 Faith's Shield 1 Think Twice 2 Electrickery 1 Harvest Pyre 1 Jace, Memory Adept 3 Boros Reckoner 1 Warleader's Helix 3 Ral Zarek 1 Moorland Haunt 15 cards

For more information about exactly how this deck works, I would encourage you to check out the full article. But for now, I want to briefly look at how this deck might be tweaked for Standard Pauper. Here are my initial thoughts, in no particular order:

1. Replacing Guttersnipe with Delver of Secrets seems like a no-brainer. While not quite as reliable, given the 28 spells in the deck, flipping Delver should be trivial.
2. Boros Charm doesn't have any parallel at Common, but according to the article it is primarily used either to protect your creatures or give the Nivix Cyclops double strike. Unfortunately, the latter is currently impossible in Standard Pauper. My initial choice then is to replace Boros Charm with Blue protection spells like Negate or Dispel.
3. Similarly, nothing in the format is as versatile as Izzet Charm. Since Travis mentions uses for all three modes, one could conceive of a mix of additional counters, burn spells like Brimstone Volley or Thunderbolt, or even another cheap Flashback card such as Geistflame, Think Twice, or Silent Departure.
4. Another playset of a single creature seems warranted, particularly one that gains some advantage from hitting an opponent for damage. Stealer of Secrets seems like a decent possibility, as does Heirs of Stromkirk. Alternatively, one could simply run the perennial favorite Frostburn Weird.
5. The original build splashes White not only for Boros Charm but also for Sideboard options. White cards that might be worth considering include Feeling of Dread, Keening Apparition, Beckon Apparition, or Smite.

Next time, I will continue my look at this deck and offer up a complete decklist for testing! But for now, I'd love to hear your thoughts on the deck and any potential improvements. Thanks for reading.

Revenge of the Smurfs

No, not those ones...

Instead I am talking about the recent success in Standard Pauper of a mono Blue Aggro / Control deck that goes by a variety of different names, including The Blue Horde,  Diving Mage, or even Blue Flying Army. While a quick glance at these different decklists shows some interesting variations, each of these decks utilize of a powerful force of Blue creatures and back them up with various Control elements to overwhelm an opponent and hold onto the advantage until he or she is defeated.

For the sake of discussion, let's take a quick look at the winning deck from MPDC 21.04.

The Blue Horde

played by Adner in MPDC 21.04

Creatures 4 Delver of Secrets 4 Stormbound Geist 3 Cloudfin Raptor 3 Frostburn Weird 3 Stitched Drake 2 Nephalia Seakite 1 Faerie Invaders 1 Mist Raven 21 cards Other Spells 4 Essence Scatter 4 Negate 2 Dispel 2 Silent Departure 2 Think Twice 2 Thought Scour 1 Hands of Binding 1 Mizzium Skin 18 cards

Lands 18 Island 3 Haunted Fengraf 21 cards Sideboard 3 Cancel 3 Elgaud Shieldmate 2 Dispel 2 Unsummon 2 Silent Departure 1 Frostburn Weird 1 Bone to Ash 1 Mizzium Skin 15 cards

There are several things worth pointing out here:

1. With the exception of the excellent Frostburn Weird, all of the creature in the main deck have (or will have) Flying.
2. The deck has a high number of permission spells, including 10 counters, card draw, bounce, and even singleton copies of Hands of Binding and Mizzium Skin.
3. Notice too how the deck supports the permission spells, with plenty of options for relevant Instants or creatures with Flash to cast when you hold up mana for a counterspell but don't end up casting it during your opponent's turn.
4. Finally, the Sideboard allows the deck to slide from Aggro/Control into a build with an even greater emphasis on Control.

Given all the discussion about how broken Ghostly Flicker is right now, this deck seems uniquely suited to give Flicker-based decks a run for their money. While pilot skill (and a little good luck) certainly played their role, it shouldn't surprise anyone that this deck went 7-0 in the last event. And with that kind of success, I imagine this deck archetype will see plenty of play in upcoming events.

So what do you think of the deck? Have you played it or against it yet? Do you agree that it has a strong game against Flicker decks? What are its weaknesses?

Thanks for reading.

Control Magic in Standard Pauper

Last week, I wrote about whether or not the addition of the Gatekeeper cycle to the Standard Pauper pool is sufficient reason to ban Ghostly Flicker from the format. Since the release of Dragon's Maze, there have been only a handful of decks in the Top 8 taking advantage of this interaction, and even fewer that make full use of my favorite Gatekeeper to combine with Ghostly Flicker - Smelt Ward Gatekeeper.

Upon first glance, Smelt Ward Gatekeeper doesn't seem all that powerful. True, as long as you control two Gates, you get both a 2/4 Warrior and an Act of Treason for the very reasonable . However, Act of Treason has not seen much play in Standard Pauper, except as a Sideboard option for highly aggressive decks. However, there are two potent interactions that become possible once you gain control of that creature. Let's take a look at both of them:

First, if you have the means to blink the creature - that is, to exile the creature and then return it to the battlefield under your control - the second effect of Act of Treason is forgotten by the creature when it returns, and you get to keep the creature at the end of the turn. Currently, this can be accomplished using the aforementioned Ghostly Flicker or the less popular Cloudshift.

Second, you can instead sacrifice the creature, sending it to your opponent's Graveyard just as if you had destroyed it or killed it either in combat or through lethal damage. Currently, there are a total of 12 spells or creatures that allow you to sacrifice a creature. As far as creatures are concerned, your only options are Bloodflow Connoisseur, Bloodthrone Vampire, Corpse Blockade, Falkenrath Torturer, or Stitcher's Apprentice, none of which currently see much if any play. But when it comes to spells, you have at least four options worth considering - Altar's Reap, Bone Splinters, Devour Flesh, and Fling. Each of these not only acts as a removal spell for the creature you've 'borrowed,' but also gives you some incremental advantage - even if that's just a few points of Life, as is the case with Devour Flesh. Of these, Altar's Reap and Devour Flesh are my favorites, simply because the cards retain their usefulness even without the Gatekeeper and can be cast as Instants.

I would love to see a build based around these two powerful interactions. I personally have been testing my own version, which I intend to write about in the future. But for the moment, how would you take advantage of these combinations? Or are they even powerful enough to warrant building around? As always, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Thanks for reading.

Class Is In Session

While I know from my post last Thursday that much of my audience is more interested in Magic the Gathering and other video games than they are in the fantasy genre, one of my founding purposes for this blog was to post about my own journey as a fledgling fantasy author. To that end, beginning on June 3rd, I will be participating in a creative writing class taught by none other than the illustrious Brandon Sanderson.

As I have mentioned before, Sanderson teaches just such a course at Brigham Young University in Utah. Last year, one of his students recorded an entire semester worth of lectures on video and posted them to YouTube for the world to partake of. Now, this summer, he's back with a new semester worth of lectures, as well as some additional content designed to complement the lectures. You can read all about it here.

This online content is hosted on the blog of one Scott Ashton, who is working on his Masters degree and utilizing this for his master's project. He is also providing all of this for free. Yes, that's right, absolutely free.

So if you ever wanted to take just such a class, I encourage you to browse over to the site, read all the details, and sign up to participate. It's going to be quite the experience, and one that I guarantee will make you a better writer. And if that's not enough, you can even listen to Sanderson introduce the class below:

Thanks for reading. Feel free to comment below. See you next time!

Is Ghostly Flicker Worth Banning in Standard Pauper?

Ghostly Flicker seemed innocent enough...

Released in Avacyn Restored, this card allows you to exile two permanents you control (excluding Enchantments and Planeswalkers), then immediately return them to the battlefield under your control. As an Instant for , this seemed decent but not certainly not broken. With it, you could dodge an incoming removal spell, break free of a crippling Aura, or get additional value out of any 'enters-the-battlefield' type effects. Of course, at least in Standard Pauper, there was a dearth of strong permanents with these sorts of effects, and so the card was not deemed particularly powerful.

Then, with the release of Magic 2013, this card suddenly became part of a powerful combo, thanks to another seemingly insignificant card - Archaeomancer. Back in August, I dedicated an entire article to this particular combo, which you can read here. But essentially, when you cast Ghostly Flicker with Archaeomancer as one of the targets, you not only get to bounce Ghostly Flicker into your hand, you get any 'enters-the-battlefield' type effect of the other target.

Of course, this still wasn't enough to make anyone think Ghostly Flicker was worth banning. After all, while there were certainly some strong scenarios that made us of this combo, it was hardly game-breaking. And, although this archetype saw plenty of play in Standard Pauper, it never really became one of the dominant decks in the metagame.

But now, a new cycle of Commons has entered the metagame and changed everything:

Again, I dedicated an entire article to the Gatekeeper cycle, and discussed the pros and cons of these interesting creatures. But consider, for a moment, the type of effects one can produce at Instant speed by using Ghostly Flicker with one of these creatures:

* Draw a card.
* Gain 7 Life.
* Create a 2/2 Knight token.
* Give a target creature -2/-2 until end of turn.
* Gain control of target creature an opponent controls.

Think about that. Those last three are particularly potent, and something that has rarely ever been available at Instant speed.

Needless to say, it didn't take long for some players to call for the immediate banning of Ghostly Flicker. In fact, you can read the resulting discussion over on the Standard forums of PDCMagic.com. Now at this point my plan is to write a feature-length article discussing this exact issue. But, in short, I think banning Ghostly Flicker is a poor idea, and here's why:

1. The Flicker Combo has been around quite a while, and certainly has not proven itself broken in the past.
2. There are multiple ways to interact with the combo, including graveyard removal, counterspells, and creature removal.
3. It is too early in the new metagame to even know whether it's even an issue; on a related note, banning it now would prevent all sorts of exploration in the new metagame.

I would encourage you to read the discussion for yourself. And, if you come to some conclusions of your own, I'd love to hear about them. And as always, thanks for reading.